« Love & Hate | Home | Most Wanted »

November 29, 2008

Heroes versus Terminator : The Sarah Connor Chronicles



It's been no secret that I've been hating Season 3 of Heroes  and loving Season 2 of Terminator : The Sarah Connor Chronicles, so I thought it would be interesting to try and understand why.

Both shows have a big enough budget to look realistic and have high quality production values, so it's not that one show is handicapped monetarily compared to the other, instead it comes down to the writing and the execution.

Heroes tries to throw an endless stream of action at the viewer in the hope to keep them entertained. It seems to me an artefact of confidence, it's as though Heroes doesn't believe that the writing will carry the episode. The Sarah Connor Chronicles on the other hand believes in the writing, it's execution is nicely stylish and often understated, focussing on the characters. Even moments that sound like they could be cheesey are pulled off: take the episode where Sarah Connor was reading The Wizard Of Oz to a young boy, whilst John battled a Terminator; lovely stuff.

What The Sarah Connor Chronicles succeeds at is creating a world of interesting characters, about which we are constantly discovering something. It's the classic story essence of creating a situation to which a character must react, where that reaction shows us something new about the character. And consequently we come to care about the characters, or at least retain interest in them. Even the Ex-Rockstar Scottish T1000, of which I have been critical, had an episode looking after a child, which showed us something about the robot and it's intentions.

In Heroes the characters decisions seem unrealistic and rushed with an emphasis on twists and stunt plots, Sylar becoming "good" for example. Lost is a show that does twists well, because they are often bonkers, entirely unpredictable and planned in there from the start (more or less). Heroes plot twists feel like an exercise in attempted viewer retention.

From the beginning Heroes has bet everything on the big spectacular story arc, almost at the expense of everything else. And it hasn't paid off, because the story hasn't been strong enough. The Sarah Connor Chronicles on the other hand has a well known ending, or at least a possible one, and the story concentrates on the small battles along the way.

I should also mention Lena Headey who does a really fantastic job of being Sarah Connor, I think she's great, and the show never ignores her. Heroes best character, Hiro, on the the other hand is given weak plots and sidelined for long periods. You would have thought that it would be obvious that more should be made of him.

Consequently, as a summation of all these things, I force myself to watch Heroes, and I really look forward to watching The Sarah Connor Chronicles every week, it's quality Science Fiction and I'm enjoying it immensely.



1 TrackBack

Science Fiction television in 2008. Wow, what happened? It seemed to explode. Not all of it good mind you, but some of it was great. And some of it was unexpectedly enjoyable. And that's just the shows that the judges... Read More

3 Comments

http://coolstuffandmovies.blogspot.com/2008/11/response-to-heroes-vs-tscc-from-bdo.html

Yes, Yes Yes!

You couldn't be more right. Casting Lena Headey was a stroke of genius. She really grounds the show. You can see that she knows she has to lead, but only up to a point. You can always see that her responsibility with respect to John takes an enormous emotional toll. She's partly eager and partly reluctant for John to assume his role.

I think Dekker is great too. As a contrast, I keep thinking of Hayden Christensen in Star Wars. He went through the motions but I never felt the menace that was supposed to lingering beneath (i'll blame a lot of that on Lucas though, who shares some of James Cameron's flaws). Obviously John Connor isn't a Vader figure, but that "mad genius" quality that leaders sometimes have is rearing it's head. The character is asserting himself this season, which is just a joy to watch. He's stopped acquiescing As you mention, it's all being rolled out slowly.

I should add I was never a huge fan of the movies. They're great entertainment, but apart from the usual time travel paradoxes they don't really set the wheels of your mind turning. The TV show on the other hand is exploring all these issues of trust, fate, and faith more in depth. The movies could only pay these ideas lip service between explosions, but the show is able to dig deeper due to the pacing and (perhaps) also due to the budgetary constraints.

I wasn't a big fan of Derek's old flame showing up, and yet another wispy 5'4" femme fatale, but I'm being won over gradually. I've come to trust these writers to give most everything a chance.

Heroes does what too many shows do - the characters have been twisted to serve the plot and the whims of the writers, where it should be the other way around. Galactica has done this from Season 2 forward. Another day, another incarnation of Lee Adama.