« Fancy Participating At Worldcon 2009? | Home | Post 1991 SciFi Classics? »

June 26, 2008

The Definition Of Science fiction

Jonathan McCalmont's latest Futurismic column (Blasphemous Geometries) is online and entitled How to define a genre … and why not to bother...

Scientists have proved that 86.4% of all arguments in genre boil down to disagreements over what does and does not fit within a particular genre or subgenre.

Excellent stuff. Personally I definitely prefer saying "this is what I call Science Fiction" rather than the tick-list definition approach.

2 Comments

I quite like Theodore Sturgeon's definition myself:

"A science fiction story is a story built around human beings, with a human problem, and a human solution, which would not have happened at all without its scientific content"

But generally speaking I think arguing about genre definitions are pointless as is the habit of defining every sub-genre and sub-sub-genre.

Then again I'm the guy who likes to say sci-fi just because I know it annoys some people.